SEE MY VIDEO
https://youtu.be/Iq6F9MSc9lM
Narcissism, Mob Mentality and Politics
https://youtu.be/Iq6F9MSc9lM
Narcissism, Mob Mentality and Politics
Narcissism, Mobs
and Politics How Does This Impacts the Political Climate
Group Psychology,
the Mob Mentality and Collective Group Fantasies
A
Psychohistorical Approach
Joan Jutta
Lachkar, Ph.D.
February 13,
2020
Joan Jutta Lachkar, Ph.D. is a licensed Psychotherapist in private practice in
Sherman Oaks, California, an affiliate member for the New Center for
Psychoanalysis, is the author of The Narcissistic/Borderline
Couple: How to Talk to a Narcissist, How to Talk to a Borderline, The
V-Spot, and many other publications. She
is also a psychohistorian a discipline which analyzes political and historical
events from a psychodynamic perspective. Wrote such articles as The Psychological
Make-up of a Suicide Bomber and The Psychopathology of Terrorism.
Welcome to the
Mob!
.
Introductory comments
The effort here is to illustrate how people
in politics with a high conflict personality e. g., a narcissist impacts the
political climate. Many have accused present and past presidents of being “narcissistic!” But are they? First, I will start defining
narcissism along with eight kinds of narcissists including the healthy
narcissist, the pathological narcissist, malignant narcissist, the artist, the cross-cultural
narcissist. Second, how people in groups tend to identify or over identify with
leaders forming collective group fantasies and how these individuals aimlessly lose
the ability to think or develop a “group mind.”
Now with our country so divided how do we find truth? We turn to two
sources. First, the role of history and the role of psychohistory. The
historical approach enters data describing as to “when” things occurred e.g.,the
holocaust! The psychohistorian tries to
explain “why” things happened, interpreting unconscious meaning through
collective group fantasies that drives people to lose the ability to
think. More specifically psychohistory
works as an adjunct to history. Thus! The Mob!
“We will drive the Jews into the Sea!
To explore these collective group
fantasies we turn to two disciplines, psychohistory and group psychology, but
first let us begin with describing narcissism. Let us start now with defining
narcissism.
The
Narcissist
When Woody Allen was asked what religion
he is
“I used to be an atheist but converted to
narcissism!”
Today we live in a narcissistic society
everything is all about me, me and me.
How do you know you are in the presence of a narcissist? You’ll know
because all they do is talk about themselves! Everyone wants their voices to be
heard. We all want to talk but no one wants to listen. In my newly published
book, How to Talk to a Narcissist. 2nd Edition, it introduces two
special languages along with methods not only “how to talk” but also how to
listen to them (or not listen). The
first is the language of empathology abstracted from works of Heinz Kohut to
meet the mirroring and self-object needs of the narcissist and the other is the
language of dialectics to meet the splitting mechanism within the spectrum of the
borderline personality. Although this is not the focus of this paper the
borderline is often a common object choice for the narcissist (see The
Narcissistic/Borderline books on Amazon.com).
The narcissist is the
special child of God (also known as “His Majesty the Narcissist). You know when
you are around because they are totally preoccupied with themselves. Narcissists are dominated by a grandiose and
exaggerated sense of self. They believe the world owes them something, have
excessive entitlement fantasies, a sense they are superior to others and when
they run out of narcissistic supplies will continue to search for others who
offer and perform as mirroring objects. They lack empathy and have a way of
diminishing the other person’s existence!
In court custody cases they are most
difficult. They are the ones who feel entitled, want all the visitation, the
money, all the furniture, and when narcissistically injured or not properly
mirrored will withdraw. People in groups often identify with narcissistic
leaders that they revere and identify with which leads us to “the mob!”
In many of my
publications I describe eight different types of narcissists (refer to Lachkar
books on Amazon.com. The healthy narcissist is one who may be totally absorbed
with their work, profession. In all the others primitive defenses do get in the
way of having healthy relations and contaminate or destroy relationships (envy,
jealousy, control, domination, competition, oedipal rivals). For example the
pathological narcissist may manipulate, lie, belittle others but are not
basically cruel where as the malignant narcissist is cruel and sadistic.
·
The Healthy Narcissist
·
The Pathological Narcissist
·
The Malignant Narcissist
·
Antisocial
·
Depressive
·
Obsessive-Compulsive
·
The Narcissist the Artist
·
The Cross-Cultural Narcissis
The Mob Mentality
We know our leader is destructive,
but he is our father and our savior, and we worship and revere him.
These
primitive types of groups band together like sheep joined by collective group fantasies and myths. When this
happens, the individual no longer exists. As Wilfred Bion states, these are
thoughtless thinkers or thinkers without a thought—those who identify with
certain leaders and revere fantasized role models, heroes, and messianic
saviors. “Gee, I want to grow up just like my terrorist uncle!” Many of these
charismatic/messianic leaders give people in these regressed groups a sense of
purpose and allow them to feel they can make meaning out of the meaningless.
We never wanted to drive the Jews into the sea, but now we have
meaning and purpose in our lives!
It has taken me years of analytic training to understand concepts of the
mob mentality and even to this day I still don’t understand it. It is still a
challenge to understand how the German people with high morals got into some
trance mass hysteria along with the Nazis to exterminate millions of Jews. Before
that they lived side by side with the Jews and went to schools together.
The first example I start with is Kristallnacht 1939 an article written
by Professor Peter Loewenberg recounts when Hiltler in Germany started with the
motive to confiscate money and wealth from the Jews. Ironically, violating all
German people’s moral values, respect
for other people’s property, respect thy neighbor, houses of worship, orderliness/cleanliness and later morphed
into mass hysteria burning of every
synagogue and later to degradation and humiliation of the Jews e.g. no toilets, Germans spitting on
them! Suddenly they because the opposite of German morality (obsession with cleanliness)
seen as filthy pigs! Sweinhunts!
A second example of the group
mind is the funeral of deceased Korean President Kim Jong-un where he got his
starving impoverished people to stand in cold freezing weather in a trance like
state in tears for a leader they idealized and revered or what I refer to as“Crocodile
Tears.”
The group mentality is like that
of a mob banded together like sheep.
When this happens, the individual no longer exists. As Wilfred Bion states,
these are thoughtless thinkers or thinkers without a thought—those who identify
with certain leaders and revere fantasized role models, heroes, and
messianic saviors. These leaders give those in the group a sense of purpose and
allow them to feel they can make meaning out of the meaningless.
So, what is the glue that
holds them together? These are people pre-programmed pre-scripted to identify
with certain group myths/fantasies or leaders they revere and idealize. In
psychological terms it is known as collective group fantasy where people together
as one in harmony and total synchronicity! “We are now one! Not a far cry from
cult-like behavior. I turn now to psychohistory.
Psychohistory
Psychohistory offers a broader perspective from which
to view cross-cultural differences using new tools and concepts to examine
history via psychohistorical lens. Psychohistory does for the group and culture
what psychoanalysis does for the individual, a discipline
that analyzes historical events very much like analyzing a patient’s dream. One
might say “So where are the facts?” Both
the analyst and the psychohistorian use analytic tools and methods to explore
conflict by studying the patient’s dreams, free associations and unconscious
fantasies.
To
penetrate these seemingly impermeable borders the psychohistorican takes into
account aspects of culture such as
religion, childrearing practices, ideology, ritual, mythology as well as their
varying psychodynamics e.g., how each culture experiences such dynamics as
shame, honor, saving face, guilt, dependency, envy, jealousy, devotion, and
meaning of self.
This allows a better understanding of individuals,
nations, governments, and political events—very much as a therapist analyzes
the couple as a symbolic representation of a political group or nation. The psychohistorian takes the liberty to
extend these concepts to cultures, nations, and groups by exploring the leaders
they identify with, and their collective group fantasies and myths.
The question often comes up what gives us
the right to analyze people, groups, dictators putting them on the couch
without ever meeting, treating or evaluating them in our clinical office? No, we don’t have the right but
we do have the right to analyse people who adhere to identify certain group
leaders. Not everyone adheres to these myths. beliefs, or ideologies, but the
ones who do are the ones who perpetuate the aggression.
In today’s contemporary clinical
practices, many therapists are completely
baffled by the inextricable, complex link of culture, customs, and traditions
connected to individual and self-identity. Psychohistory and group psychology are
the two disciplines I that I have found most valuable in my treatment of cross-cultural
couples.
Group Psychology
The Sheep Mentality, the Mob, The
Followers
Wilfred Bion’s (a renowned
psychoanalyst) work on group psychology provides a
methodology for understanding cult-like behaviors in groups. How people are
pressured and coerced to act like sheep and collude with certain leaders. In
many of my earlier contributions, I have applied Bion’s formulation of group
psychology to the study of cross-culture not only in my work in treating
cross-cultural couples, but how people in groups bond together and identify
with destructive leaders. More than any other psychoanalyst, Ion understands
the primitive, unconscious mechanisms operative in groups and how people
identify with charismatic destructive leaders and collective group myths. Many
of these group myths are based on historical archaic injuries that one has
never mourned or dealt with loss e.g., the burning of Temple Mount.
This is a
methodology that helps us understand cult-like behaviors. Why people in these
regressed groups tend to fuse, collude, conspire to find a scapegoat or
fantasized enemy project their hatred, envy and aggression. Group psychology
helps us understand how people with twisted minds form idealized parasitic
bonds with destructive leaders who collude with the group's collective myths
and fantasies. Furthermore, how people in groups/nations are blindsided by
narcissistic leaders who lie, cheat, manipulate, and perform horrific acts
against humanity? Idealization is a defense mechanism that gets in the way of
seeing reality as they view them as Gods who can do no wrong. Leaders like Hitler, Mussolini, Milosevic, and bin Laden knew how
to manipulate the group’s omnipresent fear of imminent danger (real or imagined).
Milosevic the Serbian President who tortured his people stood above the crowd
while the crowd cheered.
I
am your father and will save you!
·
Group psychology is the study of group myths and
group fantasies
·
Cult-like behaviors dominated
irrational/delusional thinking, group myths
·
Bond through collective group mutual fantasies
·
Idealization and identification with destructive
group leaders
·
Form collusive/parasitic ties with one another.
The Work Group Vs the Basic Assumption
Group (Regressed Group)
Bion further expands on group
psychology as he describes two kinds of groups, the “work group,” and the
“basic assumption group” (or the regressed group). The work group is where
people have a task and no matter what happens nothing gets in the way. The basic
assumption group starts out with a task when suddenly primitive defenses start
to invade and contaminate the group distracting them away from the task (envy,
jealousy, shame, guilt, domination, control, power, competition). To
expand on these archaic vulnerable injuries, I have coined the phrase-the
“V-spot.”
Another Concept I Originated is the V-Spot
The V-Spot is a term I devised to describe the most
sensitive area of emotional vulnerability that gets aroused when one’s partner
hits an emotional raw spot in the other. It is the emotional counterpart to the
physical G-spot (if you don’t know where you’re G-spot is come see me after).
The V-spot is the heart of our most fragile area of emotional sensitivity,
known in the literature as the archaic injury, a product of early trauma that
one holds onto. With arousal of the V-spot comes the loss of sense and
sensibility; everything shakes and shifts like an earthquake (memory, painful
experience). Do Cultures have a cultural V-spot? In noting the parallels between marital and
political conflict. I do believe like couples, cultures also have V-spots,
archaic traumatic injuries bonded through losses or a lifetime of governmental
violations keeping them forever embroiled in endless feuds. Do they blow at the slightest provocation? I
believe they do.
Do countries/nations have a cultural V-spot, whereby an entire culture adheres to
certain ideologies, collective group myths fantasies based on painful archaic
injuries and age-old sentiments handed down from generation to generation? Do
countries look at each other and say, “Hey, you hurt our feelings!” Transposed
to the cultural level, the vulnerable spot might sound like, “Don’t insult our
Prophet!” “I’d rather die than give up allegiance to my country!”
These archaic traumatic injuries have been handed down
and have sustained a lifetime of violations societal and governmental abuse,
keeping countries forever embroiled in endless feuds. Here are some V-spots:
·
Jews as the Chosen People
·
Caricature of
Mohammad
·
Arabs as the Abandoned Orphans, the Victims
·
72 Virgins in Paradise
·
Existence of the Holocaust
·
Denial of American Holocaust
·
Denial of Japanese War Crimes
·
Suicide Bombers Bring Honor
·
Denial
of Holocaust
·
The
Japanese denial of War Crimes
·
Isaac
denied first birthright and Ishmael abandoned to desert
·
Burning of the First Temple
· We will only have peace when all the infidels are destroyed
· Fake news impeachment as the final solution
The
First Archaic Injury or Original “V-spot
The
“Chosen Child” Vs. the “Abandoned Orphan”
Sara
was barren at the age of 90 and could not bear children. Meanwhile her
handmaiden Hagar as concubine got pregnant and gave birth to Ishmael.
Miraculously, Sarah gives birth to Isaac.
Once Isaac and Ishmael began to grow, Sarah asked Abraham to send Hagar
and Ishmael away to the desert and not allow Ishmael to share an inheritance
with Isaac.
Mythologically speaking of course, Isaac
becomes the chosen child and Ishmael the abandoned orphan one. Isaac is then the recipient of the “good
breast, “The Land of Milk and Honey,” and Ishmael and his followers, the
dry/desert. The Arabs not having a
strong based father figure soon embraced Allah and the Prophet Mohammad never
to be revered and never criticized. This led to my first book, The
Narcissistic/Borderline Couple, whereby I describe what happens when a
narcissist and a borderline join together in a marital bond. Without sounding
too narcissistic myself, if figured if I could understand Arabs and Jews why
not marital relationships. Next this brings up the question.
Do We have the
right to Stereotype?
Can we diagnose an entire group of people? No! We can’t, but we can diagnose their religious ideologies/belief system, rituals, myths, folklore, and collective group fantasies
Some Examples
of Stereotypes
·
Russians Paranoid
·
Germans a Guilt
Society
·
Japan a Shame/Honor/
Compliant Society (Denial WW11)
·
Islam Shame/Saving Face Society
·
Jews Narcissistic
The Chosen Ones/Entitled
·
Arabs the Abandoned
Orphans
Conclusion
The effort has been how people in politics
with a high conflict personality e. g., a narcissist impacts and can
contaminate the political climate. Many have accused present and past
presidents of being “narcissistic!” But
are they? This presentation was divided into three parts. First. I defined
narcissism along with eight kinds of narcissists including “the healthy
narcissist.” Second, I took into consideration how people in groups tend to form
a mob mentality how they go into a state of mindlessness punctuated by
identifying with powerful destructive leaders who play out the groups
collective unconscious group myths and fantasies
Joan Lachkar books Amazon.com
www.joanlachkarphd.com
jlachkar@aol.com
No comments:
Post a Comment